Method
As PDF

Citizens' Public Meeting

InformParticipateOnboardingUnderstanding & Gathering PerspectivesAnalogue1 - 3 Hours1 DayDirectly AffectedInterested PublicHard-to-Reach GroupsOrganised ActorsMedium Group up to 30Large Group from 30SimpleStructured

A Citizens' Public Meeting is an open participation format in which people are informed about a project or proposal and then invited to share their questions, opinions, suggestions, and concerns. It is particularly suitable for reaching a large number of people at the same time, increasing transparency, and gathering initial public feedback. The format usually combines an information session with an open discussion. Depending on the topic and the number of participants, discussions may take place in plenary, at themed discussion tables, or in smaller groups.

Goal

The goal of a Citizens' Assembly is to inform people about a project at an early stage and provide opportunities to ask questions, give feedback, express concerns, and share suggestions. At the same time, public authorities, policymakers, and project teams gain valuable insights from the community and make the public discussion visible and transparent.

When useful?

  • informing many people at the same time
  • gathering initial opinions and reactions
  • introducing a new project or initiative
  • increasing transparency
  • presenting a public project
  • giving citizens the opportunity to ask questions

When not useful?

  • decisions are intended to be made collectively
  • serious conflicts already exist and no professional conflict facilitation is available
  • highly individual or complex issues need in-depth discussion
  • there is no genuine opportunity to influence the outcome

Process

  • projector and screen
  • microphones
  • presentation equipment
  • seating
  • facilitation materials
  • pinboards or display boards
  • documentation materials
  • name badges
  • refreshments

Begin by considering:

  • Why is the assembly being organised?
  • Which aspects are open for discussion?
  • Which decisions have already been made?
  • Which questions remain open?

Clearly communicate what participants can influence and what is already fixed to avoid unrealistic expectations.

Consider:

  • Who is directly affected?
  • Which groups should be specifically invited?
  • Who may have an interest in the topic?

Identify groups that are often underrepresented in participation processes and use targeted communication channels and existing networks to encourage their participation.

Choose a venue that offers:

  • good accessibility
  • barrier-free access
  • sufficient seating
  • good acoustics

Schedule the event at a time that is convenient for the intended audience.

Announce the event early and provide information about:

  • the topic and purpose
  • date, time, and location
  • opportunities for participation

Use various communication channels, for example:

  • municipal websites
  • social media
  • local newspapers
  • flyers
  • community organisations and associations

Determine:

  • who will give the presentation
  • which information will be presented
  • how much time is reserved for questions
  • how feedback will be documented

Allow sufficient time for discussion, as presentations that are too long often reduce active participation.

The facilitator welcomes participants and explains:

  • the purpose of the meeting
  • the programme
  • discussion guidelines

For example: "Today we would like to present the project and gather your questions, feedback, and suggestions."

The project team presents the proposal.

Participants should receive clear answers to questions such as:

  • What is the project about?
  • Why is it being implemented?
  • What impacts are expected?
  • Which decisions are still open?

Use maps, plans, images, and other visual materials wherever possible.

Complex information should be explained in clear and accessible language.

After the presentation, participants are invited to ask factual questions.

Clarifying information before moving into discussion helps establish a common understanding.

Participants are then invited to:

  • express opinions
  • share concerns
  • make suggestions
  • contribute ideas

Depending on the group size, different formats may be appropriate.

Option A: Plenary discussion

All contributions are collected in one large discussion.

Suitable for:

  • smaller meetings
  • relatively straightforward topics

Option B: Marketplace format

Several themed discussion tables are arranged around the room.

Participants can:

  • ask questions
  • speak with experts
  • provide comments

This format works particularly well for:

  • larger audiences
  • complex projects
  • controversial topics

Option C: World Café-style discussions

Small groups discuss individual questions and develop ideas together.

This format usually allows more people to contribute than a large plenary discussion.

Participants or discussion groups present their main findings, questions, ideas, and suggestions.

The facilitator concludes by summarising:

  • recurring concerns
  • key discussion points
  • remaining open questions
  • next steps

It is important to explain clearly how participants' feedback will be used.

Record:

  • questions and comments
  • concerns and criticism
  • discussion themes
  • ideas and suggestions

Possible documentation methods include:

  • written minutes
  • photographs of flipcharts and pinboards
  • digital documentation

Inform participants about:

  • the feedback that was collected
  • how it will be considered
  • the next steps in the process

Transparency helps build trust.

Make the documentation publicly available whenever possible, for example through:

  • the project website
  • newsletters
  • social media

Source: https://partizipation.at/partizipation-anwenden/methoden/

Notes

Tips

  • Keep presentations concise.
  • Use clear language instead of technical terminology.
  • Use visual materials to explain complex topics.
  • Allow plenty of time for questions and discussion.
  • For controversial topics, smaller discussion groups are often more productive than long plenary debates.
  • Always explain what will happen next.

Not suitable for

  • collective decision-making
  • detailed concept development
  • intensive conflict resolution
  • confidential topics
  • projects with no genuine scope for public influence

Afterwards

Afterwards, methods that organise, deepen, or translate the gathered content into concrete steps are useful. Depending on the goal, the following formats can follow, for example:

Fishbowl

A Fishbowl is a simple discussion format designed for larger groups that brings movement and openness to traditional group discussions. Instead of relying on a fixed panel of speakers, participants can join and leave the discussion at any time, creating a dynamic exchange of ideas. This flexible format encourages diverse perspectives and promotes active participation.

StructuredActivating

Workshop

A workshop is a facilitated working session in which participants collaborate to explore a specific question, develop ideas, or create solutions. Depending on its purpose, a workshop can be used to share information, analyse problems, or develop concrete actions. Because all participants are actively involved, it is particularly well suited to the collaborative development of results.

CreativeActivating
Bookmarked Methods0 methods

Nothing bookmarked yet.